From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.stack.nl!reality.xs3.de!news.jacob-sparre.dk!loke.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Happy Birthday, Ada!
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 21:17:16 -0600
Organization: Jacob Sparre Andersen Research & Innovation
Message-ID: <l8b9rs$be6$1@loke.gir.dk>
References: <l87ghs$e98$1@dont-email.me> <l882j3$cu7$1@loke.gir.dk>
 <8a6e5bc6-16b5-4242-bfa1-610e2c2b7a75@googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: static-69-95-181-76.mad.choiceone.net
X-Trace: loke.gir.dk 1386818236 11718 69.95.181.76 (12 Dec 2013 03:17:16 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@jacob-sparre.dk
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 03:17:16 +0000 (UTC)
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:17982
Date: 2013-12-11T21:17:16-06:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Britt" <britt.snodgrass@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:8a6e5bc6-16b5-4242-bfa1-610e2c2b7a75@googlegroups.com...
On Tuesday, December 10, 2013 4:54:42 PM UTC-5, Randy Brukardt wrote:
> And Ada 2012 was officially standardized on this date in 2012 (last year). 
> Randy. (Yes, we asked that they do that, since it was going to be in 
> December anyway. And ISO said, no we have to issue everything on the 15th. 
> But when it came out, it was dated the 10th.)

>So why is the PDF Copy at 
>http://www.adaic.org/resources/add_content/standards/12rm/RM-Final.pdf
>dated "13 December 2012" (at the bottom of the pages)? I don't see a 
>different date anywhere else.

The free versions are not related to the official ISO versions. The date on 
the bottom is just a generation date that automatically added somewhere 
along the line; that's obviously the day that I generated it for posting. If 
I regenerated it today, it would have today's date.

The standardization date is the one on the ISO website, which I detailed in 
a different message.

                           Randy.