From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Simon Clubley <clubley@remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: a new language, designed for safety !
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 17:04:35 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <lnfav3$jnc$2@dont-email.me>
References: <lmj8s6$hhp$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <1402308235.2520.153.camel@pascal.home.net> <85ioo9yukk.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
 <ln6tlg$1vc$1@dont-email.me>
 <255b51cd-b23f-4413-805a-9fea3c70d8b2@googlegroups.com>
 <J3rmv.287368$Nf2.155042@fx01.iad> <lndulo$2d1$1@dont-email.me>
 <5b446648-8193-46c4-b99c-015d86983758@googlegroups.com>
 <lyppidne4p.fsf@pushface.org>
 <fc6edb87-c6db-42f0-89c5-4a7537dbb66e@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 17:04:35 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="e458ff8b81bc0c159989eb0e36c6e372";
	logging-data="20204"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/8T29OmlDUOeECdRH6GwxdR1fuGa8ecvo="
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (VMS/Multinet)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:flKdXcXJEYm4WPdYLZgHhEt7tsA=
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:20295
Date: 2014-06-13T17:04:35+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 2014-06-13, gvdschoot@gmail.com <gvdschoot@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Friday, June 13, 2014 3:16:38 PM UTC+2, Simon Wright wrote:
>> gvds..@gmail.com writes:
>> 
>> > The thing is: The languages with more options will win. You see that
>> > with the Rust vs Go people. Go is a language that is close to
>> > Oberon-14, with very well thought simplicity. Rust on the other hand
>> > is *the* C++ replacement and it has all the features that makes code
>> > hard to understand. But because of all these features it attracts the
>> > developers of today. Non-determinism is a very good thing
                          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> 
>> > IMO. Reasonability results in good code that is easy to maintain. But
     ^^^^
>> > we don't live in that world anymore.
>> 
>> I _hope_ you're being sarcastic.
>
> Why?

I suspect Simon's reacting to the statement about non-determinism I've
underlined. :-)

(Another) Simon.

-- 
Simon Clubley, clubley@remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP
Microsoft: Bringing you 1980s technology to a 21st century world