From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Jeffrey Carter Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: why Ada type casting is different from other languages? newType(value) vs. (newType)value Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2014 23:26:16 -0700 Organization: Also freenews.netfront.net; news.tornevall.net; news.eternal-september.org Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2014 06:26:21 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org; posting-host="ec00b5351686c67721798cbf9cd968b0"; logging-data="2381"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX192dZawSf+QeKxp19yIuOOCN9tvDw6zNg8=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 In-Reply-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:4n02d6X7m/WF1eNQbNdQOouvB08= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:20902 Date: 2014-07-12T23:26:16-07:00 List-Id: On 07/12/2014 06:55 PM, Nasser M. Abbasi wrote: > > Just wondering on this choice and its advantage over the more > common syntax. For the same reason Ada has type conversions, not type casts. "Type conversion" is clear; "type cast" must be explained if you haven't encountered it before. Ada's notation is clear; conversions involve some processing and so are like functions. C's unintuitive notation must be explained when 1st encountered. -- Jeff Carter "I would never want to belong to any club that would have someone like me for a member." Annie Hall 41