Re: why Ada type casting is different from other languages? newType(value) vs. (newType)value

[Simon Clubley <clubley@remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP>]

On 2014-07-14, G.B. <rm-dash-bau-haus@dash.futureapps.de> wrote:
>
> It appears that in some situations style alone is not a permissible
> language design guide. WRT syntax, McIver and Conway explain, with
> novice programmers in mind, that there needs to be a good signal
> to noise ratio and that this may mean just enough syntax, but also
> enough syntax.  In particular, they address "homonyms",
> as in "type(expression)" vs "something-else(expression)".
>
> "Alternatively, it may be better to increase the complex-
>   ity of the syntax in order to reduce homonyms which blur
>   the signal. For example, the meaning of the various compo-
>   nents of the Turing expression^7:
>
>
>     f(C(p).A(I))(N)
>
> "might be better conveyed with the syntax:
>
>     f(C::p->A_{I})[N]
>

To be honest, that suggestion by the authors sounds a bit bogus to me.

By the time a newcomer is far enough along to understand the concepts
behind that syntax, does that person really still need that special
syntax ?

The above is not what you would teach a student new to programming
in their first week of class.

Simon.

-- 
Simon Clubley, clubley@remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP
Microsoft: Bringing you 1980s technology to a 21st century world