From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "J-P. Rosen" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Timeouts in Ada Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 22:52:30 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <50bdb713-7ce1-411b-810b-9bdee1d26b7a@googlegroups.com> <39a6309b-2920-4cec-818a-eb8ee46474d9@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 20:52:31 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org; posting-host="2b3884a634d8f846e0712b4e3a92507a"; logging-data="2839"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19l1JPw+5A9v7DKdpd0mJzR" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 In-Reply-To: <39a6309b-2920-4cec-818a-eb8ee46474d9@googlegroups.com> Cancel-Lock: sha1:hmjCfKP2C1aoEVzF9R4aPWDBOks= X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:21024 Date: 2014-07-17T22:52:30+02:00 List-Id: Le 17/07/2014 22:29, Adam Beneschan a écrit : > J-P's statement makes no sense if we're talking about low-level or OS threads I should have included my statement between ... In practice, and not to confuse the OP, tasks correspond to OS threads. I meant that the language does not require creating separate threads when not explicitely stated. Of course, a crazy implementation can do it any way it pleases, provided it is equivalent to the model. -- J-P. Rosen Adalog 2 rue du Docteur Lombard, 92441 Issy-les-Moulineaux CEDEX Tel: +33 1 45 29 21 52, Fax: +33 1 45 29 25 00 http://www.adalog.fr