From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Jeffrey Carter Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Mission-Critical Design: Ada.Unchecked_Deallocation vs Garbage Collection Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 23:25:21 -0700 Organization: Also freenews.netfront.net; news.tornevall.net; news.eternal-september.org Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 06:25:23 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org; posting-host="ec00b5351686c67721798cbf9cd968b0"; logging-data="21737"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18IgYuhKFWDMOLB4vzRrp+9T18PFTbdhVA=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 In-Reply-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:7quv0cTWCNPKfKhYEAa2OyYvj2c= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:21037 Date: 2014-07-17T23:25:21-07:00 List-Id: On 07/17/2014 11:17 PM, NiGHTS wrote: > In mission-critical design applications, do they favor garbage collectors or > the unchecked deallocation? > > What are your thoughts on this? When is it better to use garbage collection > and when is it better to use classic new & delete memory management when a > life may be on the line? Typically, safety-critical systems don't allow dynamic allocation and deallocation. -- Jeff Carter "You a big nose have it." Never Give a Sucker an Even Break 107