From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: How to compile Barnes' examples from his book using GNAT
Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2015 14:21:45 +0000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <ly610agwzq.fsf@pushface.org>
References: <2c68ffdd-f55e-4c68-84f1-fbe0f83a0b57@googlegroups.com>
	<n415t5$uko$2@dont-email.me>
	<5ba1035b-7ffa-4ea8-b9cd-fde589b99904@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="6f4ba2ce0f80cf6975f919f4f22c2ad9";
	logging-data="10129"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19vzI/1zdpaSfvePiGroQLvmdMjlatgZg0="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (darwin)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:UfD4ZoCdlXL0vpSpOQ0uAsbxtLc=
	sha1:fn/5lMqmJpHQVwhYKkNAMvzivgk=
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:28681
Date: 2015-12-07T14:21:45+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Jerry <lanceboyle@qwest.net> writes:

> Is there a preferred way that GNAT users handle this? Do they make
> multiple package specs and bodies in one file then let gnatchop handle
> it, possibly hiding the mess in another directory, or is it preferred
> to write the many separate spec and body files from the start?

If I'm making a brief example, or trying to build someone else's
problematic code, I'd put the whole lot in a file
<problem>.ada. Otherwise, specs/bodies/separates all in files of their
own.