From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
	ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!8nKyDL3nVTTIdBB8axZhRA.user.46.165.242.75.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: GCC updated in NetBSD!
Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2021 21:02:48 +0000
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <lybl2xxaiv.fsf@pushface.org>
References: <sknedo$tm1$1@gioia.aioe.org> <lyzgr3h0t2.fsf@pushface.org>
	<lywnm29lmv.fsf@pushface.org> <sljqi3$1oiu$1@gioia.aioe.org>
	<lyr1c25s6o.fsf@pushface.org> <sls79o$1c9k$1@gioia.aioe.org>
	<20211106183219.38ba5dd2@linux.fritz.box>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="58661"; posting-host="8nKyDL3nVTTIdBB8axZhRA.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (darwin)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:lunuop0aSQXVVepxv/Du54zbQFU=
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:63103
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Fernando Oleo Blanco <irvise_ml@irvise.xyz> writes:

>                 === acats tests ===
> FAIL:   ce3404c
>
>                 === acats Summary ===
> # of expected passes            6959
> # of unexpected failures        1
> Native configuration is x86_64--netbsd

That's three times* the number of test cases. I noticed this before --
are you doing three parallel executions (the part of the script that
runs parallel executions is particularly gnarly)? Maybe only one of the
ce3404c's failed?

* more or less. Just ran for gcc version 12.0.0 20211021 with -j4,

		=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes		2328
# of unexpected failures	0

I don't think the ACATS in GCC reports all the outcomes the way it
should: in particular, there were a considerable number of 'unsupported
tests' (e.g. those where the test reports 'NOT-APPLICABLE'), and of
course this was a .0.0 (work-in-progress) release. Perhaps
x86_64-apple-darwin15 has one more unsupported test than x86_64--netbsd.