From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on
	ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1
Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!yy9MKEJN2ULhWGfnfq4v5w.user.gioia.aioe.org.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: GNAT CE 2021 is out
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 18:21:45 +0100
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <lyczslbu8m.fsf@pushface.org>
References: <69f55673-f75c-4ee7-a11b-87b6110f6133n@googlegroups.com>
	<76a267d0-3fef-4bec-8ec8-86d85a614125n@googlegroups.com>
	<b3def605-cb6e-4b36-a036-9e336de0a743n@googlegroups.com>
	<0847a8ed-623c-47fa-8dbf-7b505bd4ced0n@googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: yy9MKEJN2ULhWGfnfq4v5w.user.gioia.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (darwin)
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:s0oekCKzVXSdXATxG6JQ6IAWc/M=
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:62234
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Gautier write-only address <gautier_niouzes@hotmail.com> writes:

> Actually my issue is very similar to one appeared with GNAT GPL 2017
> (see "GNAT GPL 2017 incremental compilation").
> It is related to configuration pragma files. At the time the solution
> was to have in the .gpr project file compiler options expressed like
>     "-gnatec=" & project'Project_Dir & "debug.pra"
> because gprbuild doesn't run in the same directory as gnat since the
> GPL 2017 version.
> Now (four GPL/CE versions later) it's a bit trickier since gprbuild
> doesn't find the configuration pragma file at its correct place, even
> though gnat does.

   package Builder is
      for Global_Configuration_Pragmas use "gnat.adc";
   end Builder;

   package Compiler is
      for Local_Configuration_Pragmas use "gnat_local.adc";
   end Compiler;

Gprbuild doesn't complain about finding either of these, which are in
the same directory as the project file (I'm not sure whether they're
actually _actioned_).