From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
	ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!8nKyDL3nVTTIdBB8axZhRA.user.46.165.242.75.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Building GNAT-FSF on FreeBSD
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 11:45:05 +0000
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <lyilthu0xq.fsf@pushface.org>
References: <62081412$0$28590$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
	<lypmnpu65c.fsf@pushface.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="39657"; posting-host="8nKyDL3nVTTIdBB8axZhRA.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (darwin)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:QLTYIhR9472wHL+clX31YssSCyU=
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:63516
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org> writes:

> William <william@sterna.io> writes:
>
>> Now it's time to build) and run the ACATS 4.1y
>> I took a look at Simon’s ACATS Testsuite on SourceForge, but I need to
>> understand those automated scripts.
>> I’d like to parallise a maximum of ACATS sub-projects in order to
>> reduice time.
>
> The section "Testing in GCC" in the README tells how to run the tests
> within the GCC framework that allows parallel running. Note, you'll
> probably have to hammer C-c to abort a parallel run, the script doesn't
> respond well to that.
>
> I would have liked to get parallelising working, but those scripts! eww!

See this thread: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2018-July/226729.html

I'm not sure, but I think that GCC/Ada folk regard the ACATS (2.6, I
think) in GCC as more of a confidence thing (DEC used to call it an IVP,
Installation Verification Procedure) than a full check.

So, would you like to have run_local.sh quit altogether on C-c, or just
quit the current test as it does now?