From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Why .ads as well as .adb?
Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2019 08:34:23 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <lypnno7cow.fsf@pushface.org>
References: <28facad3-c55f-4ef2-8ef8-004925b7d1f1@googlegroups.com>
	<qcvqut$ejh$1@gioia.aioe.org>
	<dbbcf7b1-091f-4c87-b2b1-021bb9503b70@googlegroups.com>
	<qd2krk$pin$1@gioia.aioe.org>
	<f37f6f75-62d4-4152-917e-d666d67f6cb7@googlegroups.com>
	<qd6rb8$hl7$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
	<a902e41a-729d-4c00-8e3f-0cda1822a349@googlegroups.com>
	<qd81gq$aej$1@dont-email.me> <87woi0xtwm.fsf@nightsong.com>
	<glpiqeFt9jqU1@mid.individual.net>
	<f611bdb8-5a40-48bd-afe5-17de72bbe193@googlegroups.com>
	<glq1rpF1v52U1@mid.individual.net>
	<4a0438de-1f1d-4469-aae4-908854d378ea@googlegroups.com>
	<qdbvth$3db$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
	<47d02bdc-6b50-43aa-bc5d-bb5b6225f5bd@googlegroups.com>
	<455333f0-ede4-4833-900a-240a499395ac@googlegroups.com>
	<875zphvufc.fsf@nightsong.com>
	<cba691bd-6cfa-4fd4-af34-cd99af13eb8e@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="27696fb9a86c0e7aaea158a7d198be6d";
	logging-data="9873"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+ICrMUGLfyrojXcN22yaz3St/MqtKNF04="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (darwin)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:F552W1UDqz3O1xKxawNMTLPaVA8=
	sha1:mJkP2lqKZ0JaR14kL8hKocCWyps=
Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:56554
Date: 2019-06-08T08:34:23+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Brad Moore <bmoore.ada@gmail.com> writes:

> The theorems and proofs still sound like they are separate even if
> together in the same book. The theorems are not interlaced in dribs
> and drabs amongst the proof. Maybe there are proofs that are organized
> that way, but I would think that would be the exception rather than
> the rule.

Sounds like my attempts at literate programming:
http://embed-web-srvr.sourceforge.net/ews.pdf