From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1 Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!yy9MKEJN2ULhWGfnfq4v5w.user.gioia.aioe.org.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Proliferation of Reserved Words Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2021 17:06:40 +0100 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: yy9MKEJN2ULhWGfnfq4v5w.user.gioia.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:pT0TWSUqESdViDPWM6Sea14km6s= X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2 Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:62081 List-Id: "Randy Brukardt" writes: > At least twice it was proposed that Ada have "keywords", identifiers with > special meaning in the syntax but that were not reserved. The last time (and > I forget precisely when that was), the ARG had a slight majority in favor of > unreserved keywords as well as reserved words. interface, perhaps? I know we had quite a few identifiers with that spelling! TextUML is case-sensitive, so if you want to use a keyword as an identifier you can capitalize it, or prefix it with a backslash