From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: How to get Ada to ?cross the chasm?? Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 18:30:54 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <1c73f159-eae4-4ae7-a348-03964b007197@googlegroups.com> <2d02c2c2-676c-4794-96e8-31f61aedd0b8@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="46be1cdbfeaa0eeff4e3663a0ebc87c2"; logging-data="6033"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+FpP/Cxy/bGaIsGEyoNpDUJzzFb4nzJ/A=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:LzWeD33epm65XS2fHEHGuR7TIFc= sha1:PlYbsIv4onseYL5M3/Lbmu9dG+U= Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:51604 Date: 2018-04-18T18:30:54+01:00 List-Id: Lucretia writes: > On Wednesday, 18 April 2018 13:44:04 UTC+1, Simon Clubley wrote: >> Also, as far as I can see (and I am willing to be corrected here if >> I am wrong) it means that you can't even write a library in Ada under >> something other than the GPL if you are going to use the Community >> version. As soon as you compile the library source with the Community >> version, it falls under the GPL and hence any software using your >> library also falls under the GPL. > > Exactly right. Well, no: see "Can I use GPL-covered editors such as GNU Emacs to develop nonfree programs? Can I use GPL-covered tools such as GCC to compile them?" at https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#CanIUseGPLToolsForNF It's the runtime that does it.