From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED.8dY8omnix++EB5/QBRk4Sw.user.gioia.aioe.org!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Peculiarities of "of" syntax
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2020 11:27:22 +0000
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <lywo9wzzhh.fsf@pushface.org>
References: <qvd2p1$psk$1@dont-email.me>
	<wccy2udzmzg.fsf@shell02.theworld.com>
	<56cb7bc3-b966-4708-8cc7-657712d77047@googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 8dY8omnix++EB5/QBRk4Sw.user.gioia.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (darwin)
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:PiHnYQnBhZzcvT6+lWw37MHjEtU=
Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:57834
Date: 2020-01-12T11:27:22+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Alejandro R. Mosteo" <amosteo@unizar.es> writes:

> A normal function call will work there too, so why not the poor infix
> operator...

This is OK too:

   -- 3a)
   for Z of "&" (Arr, Arr) loop
     null;
   end loop;

(the switch Bob Duff mentioned, to do semantic analysis even if syntax
fails, is -gnatq)