From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,c406e0c4a6eb74ed X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!nntp.abs.net!rcn!feed3.news.rcn.net!not-for-mail Sender: jsa@rigel.goldenthreadtech.com Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: ADA Popularity Discussion Request References: <49dc98cf.0408110556.18ae7df@posting.google.com> <6F2Yc.848$8d1.621@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net> <2L-dnRmP6qOePaLcRVn-ug@megapath.net> From: jayessay Organization: Tangible Date: 14 Sep 2004 10:28:17 -0400 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: DXC=9Bmhk\7F3?coB:SEihUONk0R]m=BkYWIg:6bU3OT9S9j1Do7[kA0lTf^aM2i8keRmm8Q`9fCm<7dj X-Complaints-To: abuse@rcn.com Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3720 Date: 2004-09-14T10:28:17-04:00 List-Id: "Randy Brukardt" writes: > "jayessay" wrote in message > news:m3sm9n8nk2.fsf@rigel.goldenthreadtech.com... > > "Randy Brukardt" writes: > > > > > "jayessay" wrote in message > > > news:m3wtz7e4hd.fsf@rigel.goldenthreadtech.com... > > > > kevin.cline@gmail.com (Kevin Cline) writes: > > > ... > > > > > I thought so too, until I tried incremental test-first development. > > > > > Retesting a unit after adding a few lines of code means that type > > > > > mismatches are caught immediately with or without strong typing. > But > > > > > it goes faster if you don't have to compile and link every > iteration. > > > > > > > > Exactly. Actually this sort of development will save you much more > > > > time and money than you could ever hope for from typical static > typing. > > > > > > This seems like complete nonsense to me. (I'll admit that I've read > other > > > people making similar claims). > > > > Have a look at this: > > > > http://martinfowler.com/articles/newMethodology.html > > > > and I think you will have a somewhat better idea of what this is > > about. > > "Access to this site timed-out". Comes up instantly for me, from different machines on different nets. > Doesn't bode well for the quality of the software... :-) Looks like simple html to me, ("hand written"), and using Apache. Maybe the broken stuff is on your side. > Seriously, I'm always very skeptical of "methodologies", because > they primarily seem geared toward selling books and consulting to > clueless management types. There's usually a few obvious truths > sprinkled around to make them more palatable. Agreed, absolutely. The nice thing about the above is that it is not much about any "methodology", but merely an overview of why something like "agile" techniques are (re)gaining interest. > For a test-first scheme to have any hope of success, you have to have As I pointed out elsewhere, I think a much better way of thinking about the kind of incremental development I was discussing is that of developing a theory in mathematics. I typically spend 0 time in debugging sessions. /Jon -- 'j' - a n t h o n y at romeo/charley/november com