From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,6511c3dc6e1155c9 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!easynet-monga!easynet.net!teaser.fr!enst.fr!melchior!cuivre.fr.eu.org!melchior.frmug.org!not-for-mail From: Stephen Leake Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GWindows and David Botton Date: 25 Sep 2004 08:06:46 -0400 Organization: Cuivre, Argent, Or Message-ID: References: <5uKdnY_3FYH0C87cRVn-ig@megapath.net> <3OS4d.3622$Pz3.413@trndny01> NNTP-Posting-Host: lovelace.ada-france.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org 1096114016 38856 212.85.156.195 (25 Sep 2004 12:06:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 12:06:56 +0000 (UTC) To: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org Return-Path: In-Reply-To: <3OS4d.3622$Pz3.413@trndny01> User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ada-france.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Gateway to the comp.lang.ada Usenet newsgroup" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:4162 Date: 2004-09-25T08:06:46-04:00 "stephane richard" writes: > >If there was sufficient demand, I could probably be talked into making the > >est of the Claw Binding (not the GUI Builder -- gotta keep something back!) > >GMGPL. > > Well here's my demand ;-). Stephane, I understand your enthusiasm for all Windows bindings. But it would be best if the few of us who are willing to work on Windows bindings agree to take just one forward. We should compare Windex, Gwindows, and Claw, and decide which one makes the best starting point. Or decide to merge all three into some new product. Or pick some other approach. It might be good to start with some general requirements (like "do anything Visual Basic 6 can do"). I suspect Randy will stick to Claw, since he's supporting it as a commercial product. Randy; would you be open to having others contribute to making architectural decisions about the future development of Claw? -- -- Stephe