From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,deac256a05c84a59 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.agarik.com!usenet-fr.net!enst.fr!melchior!cuivre.fr.eu.org!melchior.frmug.org!not-for-mail From: Stephen Leake Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: DOM and SAX parsing in Ada Date: 28 Jan 2005 05:00:13 -0500 Organization: Cuivre, Argent, Or Message-ID: References: <41900010.D28DD400@boeing.com> <9CWjd.17305$5K2.1356@attbi_s03> <1106223415.857525.176640@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> <41F4DB6F.4090909@mailinator.com> <35nh12F4oe4caU1@individual.net> <35pmqtF4iqgimU1@individual.net> <1106820016.e20ede44b96063b70b5f6f5503a7b1a9@teranews> NNTP-Posting-Host: lovelace.ada-france.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org 1106906428 86797 212.85.156.195 (28 Jan 2005 10:00:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 10:00:28 +0000 (UTC) To: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org Return-Path: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ada-france.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Gateway to the comp.lang.ada Usenet newsgroup" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:8044 Date: 2005-01-28T05:00:13-05:00 "Steve" writes: > If the libre site granted read access to the XML/Ada CVS and a reasonable > response time in reviewing and applying patches to an XML/Ada, I would see > no need to maintain a separate repository. I cannot however see any > financial advantage for them to do so, and doubt they will. Let's make sure we've asked AdaCore, and confirmed that they won't do this, before starting a SourceForge branch. Pascal seems to be implying that AdaCore might put a readable CVS tree at the Libre site. > So in my opinion if XML/Ada is to grow outside of AdaCore, a > separate repository is warranted. If AdaCore does not create a readable XML/Ada tree, then I agree with you; a SourceForge branch of XML/Ada makes sense. -- -- Stephe