From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,deac256a05c84a59 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!enst.fr!melchior!cuivre.fr.eu.org!melchior.frmug.org!not-for-mail From: Stephen Leake Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: DOM and SAX parsing in Ada Date: 28 Jan 2005 05:05:02 -0500 Organization: Cuivre, Argent, Or Message-ID: References: <41900010.D28DD400@boeing.com> <9CWjd.17305$5K2.1356@attbi_s03> <1106223415.857525.176640@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> <41F4DB6F.4090909@mailinator.com> <35nh12F4oe4caU1@individual.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lovelace.ada-france.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org 1106906724 87820 212.85.156.195 (28 Jan 2005 10:05:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 10:05:24 +0000 (UTC) To: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org Return-Path: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ada-france.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Gateway to the comp.lang.ada Usenet newsgroup" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:8045 Date: 2005-01-28T05:05:02-05:00 Nick Roberts writes: > Brian May wrote: > > > ... > > The implication here is if you move the project to sourceforge, you can't > > control who contributes changes to the code. > > > > This is not true, even if you place a CVS repository on sourceforge > > (optional step) you can still control who has write access, and make sure > > the only people who have write access have signed the agreement. > > I am merely reporting what was my understanding of what the AdaCore employee > was telling me. He warned me that it might be impractical (even if > theoretically possible) to obtain the necessary signed agreement from all > contributors to a SourceForge project. (Again, I hope I'm recalling the gist > of the exchange correctly.) The problem of getting proper signed agreements is not limited to SourceForge projects. I suspect the AdaCore employee was just reflecting that it is a problem in general, and one AdaCore does not want to have to deal with. -- -- Stephe