From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,776a7f0c329d226e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!proxad.net!freenix!enst.fr!melchior!cuivre.fr.eu.org!melchior.frmug.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Amado Alves Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Isnt Gnat irrelevant ? ( was Re: Will the World ever seesomethingbeyond GNAT 3.15p?) Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 23:06:43 +0000 Organization: Cuivre, Argent, Or Message-ID: References: <41e503af_1@baen1673807.greenlnk.net> <41e52252$1_1@baen1673807.greenlnk.net> <10ubu795m26ddf1@corp.supernews.com> <41e64436_1@baen1673807.greenlnk.net> <1711413.SSJOl95tSF@linux1.krischik.com> <87wtuhi6qk.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> <87u0pjq4cm.fsf@insalien.org> <87mzvbpr56.fsf@insalien.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lovelace.ada-france.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org 1105744000 50811 212.85.156.195 (14 Jan 2005 23:06:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 23:06:40 +0000 (UTC) To: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org Return-Path: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: <87mzvbpr56.fsf@insalien.org> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Jan 2005 23:06:18.0449 (UTC) FILETIME=[A7B95410:01C4FA8D] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ada-france.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Gateway to the comp.lang.ada Usenet newsgroup" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:7787 Date: 2005-01-14T23:06:43+00:00 Ludovic Brenta wrote: > Marius Amado Alves writes: > >>>... the author must receive some measurable sort of compensation, >>>lest the contract be null and void. >> >>If this is true then the contract you sign with ACT for the academic >>package is null because you don't give them anything back. What >>happens next I'm not sure. Probably your copy of the software and >>all copies made thereof must be destroyed. Insane. > > It depends. Does the contract restrict you in any way? I thought that had been established. Yes, the contract restricts use for academic purposes only. > IANAL, but my understanding is that, > without compensation, the contract is void but the license (here the > GPL) still applies. IANAL either, but usually when a contract is anulled the state of affairs previous to the contract must be restored. In this case the previous state is no copies distributed. The license becomes irrelevant.