From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b9e1cb4c8c3d0d7f
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!cyclone1.gnilink.net!spamkiller2.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!trndny04.POSTED!c2bfcbcf!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Wiki on Ada
References: <10095813.DNUPcIA2bI@linux1.krischik.com>
 <eKgjd.882$V41.880@attbi_s52>
Message-ID: <opsg2svzlq5afhvo@localhost>
From: "Ed Falis" <falis@verizon.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Opera M2/7.54 (Linux, build 751)
Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2004 03:49:05 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.160.169.144
X-Complaints-To: abuse@verizon.net
X-Trace: trndny04 1099799345 68.160.169.144 (Sat, 06 Nov 2004 22:49:05 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2004 22:49:05 EST
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:6027
Date: 2004-11-07T03:49:05+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Sun, 07 Nov 2004 03:35:38 GMT, Steve <nospam_steved94@comcast.net>  
wrote:

> After reading the Programming:Ada description, which has a mix half  
> truths
> and misconceptions, it makes me wonder:
>   Does Wikibooks have any sort of reputation for accuracy?
>   If it does, some work needs to be done.  If it is generally recognized  
> as
> half truths and misconceptions, then it is probably not worth correcting.

Since it's a Wiki, anyone can update the pages.  I've just corrected a few  
misconceptions.  Feel free to elaborate.