From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,65ee5ef07756dfe2
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: u_int32_t <u_int32_t@aol.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: OpenALada
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 01:14:36 -0800
Message-ID: <pan.2005.01.23.09.14.36.168649@aol.com>
References: <1106443820.514819.135740@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
 <pan.2005.01.23.02.34.45.104918@fal.com> <41f35d8b$1@news.broadpark.no>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net 8ZVvgeDu9e8WqiOyE0YjAgi8wQMD9DGCaSCXo0RdTfszC10S87
User-Agent: Pan/0.14.2 (This is not a psychotic episode. It's a cleansing
 moment of clarity.)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:7940
Date: 2005-01-23T01:14:36-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 09:17:15 +0100, Preben Randhol wrote:
> What is wrong with having a binding to openal too? 

Hmm, I guess I was being a prick.