From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: How to get Ada to "cross the chasm"?
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 09:40:46 +0200
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <pbuk5u$9mf$2@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <1c73f159-eae4-4ae7-a348-03964b007197@googlegroups.com>
 <878t9nemrl.fsf@nightsong.com>
 <de23c005-4b50-4910-9327-6d4acdaa7270@googlegroups.com>
 <87h8o7lowg.fsf@nightsong.com>
 <c15bd651-b717-420e-a0d2-7ed27289cd28@googlegroups.com>
 <8736zqkwat.fsf@nightsong.com>
 <6839088c-f221-4650-a6ea-1841ae539486@googlegroups.com>
 <1e5f5681-0e2a-43cc-9437-2bd38078da08@googlegroups.com>
 <87604lvkqp.fsf@nightsong.com>
 <0bd80336-595a-45b6-b4e5-26c13d5859cb@googlegroups.com>
 <87o9idsh7f.fsf@nightsong.com>
 <b2ec5521-db67-40d8-8001-21853ab5222e@googlegroups.com>
 <87k1t1s9lx.fsf@nightsong.com> <pbr1e3$kfl$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
 <pbs316$ad8$2@gioia.aioe.org>
 <d39f8a7e-1568-48a2-982d-f1ac6cecf975@googlegroups.com>
 <pbtmq3$42s$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: MyFhHs417jM9AgzRpXn7yg.user.gioia.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.7.0
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.3
Content-Language: en-US
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:51743
Date: 2018-04-27T09:40:46+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 27/04/2018 01:19, Randy Brukardt wrote:

> Too much focus on static proving leads to neglecting what can be done with
> dynamic checks and especially a combination of both.

Easy, kill dynamic checks, one more self-inflicted problem solved.

There is no such thing as dynamic check. It is either a contract to 
raise exception or a language bug.

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de