From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Jeffrey R. Carter" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: How to get Ada to ?cross the chasm?? Date: Sat, 12 May 2018 12:57:01 +0200 Organization: Also freenews.netfront.net; news.tornevall.net; news.eternal-september.org Message-ID: References: <1c73f159-eae4-4ae7-a348-03964b007197@googlegroups.com> <87zi1gz3kl.fsf@nightsong.com> <878t8x7k1j.fsf@nightsong.com> <87k1sg2qux.fsf@nightsong.com> <87h8njmk4r.fsf@nightsong.com> <87po27fbv9.fsf@nightsong.com> <87in7x62vw.fsf@nightsong.com> <878t8szdtk.fsf@nightsong.com> <87tvrdhl5v.fsf@nightsong.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sat, 12 May 2018 10:57:02 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="278cc7421811c1702777470b026ab5c4"; logging-data="30713"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18LaoEdWC2XplKWxzy3T8z8sBLbTXx9aZo=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Cancel-Lock: sha1:J7Qyz6kse6LNobTvkvF/uds8b90= Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:52313 Date: 2018-05-12T12:57:01+02:00 List-Id: On 05/12/2018 11:29 AM, Niklas Holsti wrote: > > Agile versus waterfall depends on the project's goals rather than the language, > I feel. In some projects -- space on-board SW is typical -- the customer knows > what is wanted, based on intense earlier analysis of the mission, its scientific > or technical aims, SW/HW trade-offs etc. In agile projects there is flexibility > in the scope, the HW, the functionality, everything. Agile is coders' response to employers who heard that they should hire S/W engs who use a method: We'll call what we do (shut up and start coding) a method. We'll throw in pair programming so they hire twice as many of us. (When engineering S/W, code generation should be mechanical.) > I am reminded of the Mythbusters TV shows where the goal is to construct just > about anything with duct tape :-) And here I thought the goal was to blow things up. -- Jeff Carter "Death awaits you all, with nasty, big, pointy teeth!" Monty Python & the Holy Grail 20