From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Bj=c3=b6rn_Lundin?= <b.f.lundin@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: How to get Ada to ?cross the chasm??
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 16:57:19 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <pi2ho4$hul$1@dont-email.me>
References: <1c73f159-eae4-4ae7-a348-03964b007197@googlegroups.com>
 <878t9nemrl.fsf@nightsong.com>
 <a87b8599-5df5-49a7-baef-6a4f43410f6a@googlegroups.com>
 <51e6f75e-6c39-49c5-949e-bf92a9dbf96a@googlegroups.com>
 <pb2op0$vh8$1@dont-email.me>
 <f1fb66fa-10e3-4115-a5f3-94366d3be332@googlegroups.com>
 <3c4cd2b3-6b1f-41b4-a889-269689239612@googlegroups.com>
 <87fu0rlmew.fsf@adaheads.home>
 <56f5fa2f-7790-4208-bd13-ddb08fc09a1a@googlegroups.com>
 <pi2c7i$c9t$1@dont-email.me> <ly7em3fa1s.fsf@pushface.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 15:01:24 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="80aef8e47d62ad575841576e0deb7883";
	logging-data="18389"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+AStf+fbbRDfjHuqc5mXM7"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.8.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ychJ2IgwTEPicHL1e/nibO/XE30=
In-Reply-To: <ly7em3fa1s.fsf@pushface.org>
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:53758
Date: 2018-07-10T16:57:19+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 2018-07-10 16:19, Simon Wright wrote:

>> No tasking and only local exception is not enough for me.
>> I have not contemplated what the other restrictions really means for me
> 
> Those restrictions are what you'd find in a zero-footprint bare machine
> package. Are you quite sure about what you downloaded?
> 

Hmm, hang on. There are two system.ads
The one stated above is in
x86_64-pc-mingw32\BSPs\native-x86_64\zfp\arch

and the other is in
x86_64-pc-mingw32\7.3.2\adainclude


The one quoted above is the first one.
But it makes more sense if the compiler would use the second one.
The reason I thought it was the first one is silent crashes
on tasks- But that migth have other reasons.

But what is the
x86_64-pc-mingw32\BSPs\native-x86_64\zfp\arch\system.ads
doing here? cross compile ? to what?


-- 
--
Björn