From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,9bb56e94a4c5bb5e
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!news-out.visi.com!spool-3.news.visi.com!attcg2!ip.att.net!news.binc.net!kilgallen
From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: How unchecked conversion works?
Date: 16 Jan 2005 10:14:22 -0600
Organization: LJK Software
Message-ID: <qUMSIakyEq1d@eisner.encompasserve.org>
References: <MtzFd.82780$C94.78656@tornado.fastwebnet.it>
  <gemini.iadaz7002y97g02bc.nick.roberts@acm.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org
X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1105892059 10490 192.135.80.34 (16 Jan 2005
 16:14:19 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 16:14:19 +0000 (UTC)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:7849
Date: 2005-01-16T10:14:22-06:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <gemini.iadaz7002y97g02bc.nick.roberts@acm.org>, Nick Roberts <nick.roberts@acm.org> writes:
> Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) wrote:
> 
>> No security environment was specified, so I shall presume something that
>> can be evaluated at the current equivalent of "A1" is required.
> 
> As I understand it, ther is no system in existence certified to A1.

I remember that the Honeywell SCOMP was evaluated at the A1 level.

I presume your requirement was not that it also be a system that
is still sold, or made a profit when it was being sold :-)

But http://www.dynamoo.com/orange/summary.htm lists two others.