From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED.3d73Ybk3C5U4I2t8lv+lAQ.user.gioia.aioe.org!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Latest suggestion for 202x Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 18:43:28 +0200 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: References: <728c4668-8fa0-4a57-a502-2bf476fc3940@googlegroups.com> <4908c3e3-18dc-4953-bf26-46f160d2ebfd@googlegroups.com> <9dcf22a2-2255-4089-b1f0-93e31448415e@googlegroups.com> <86h88obeu0.fsf@gaheris.avalon.lan> <39e749cd-de5c-44fa-b8ec-50d36f3bd52c@googlegroups.com> <87tvcons68.fsf@nightsong.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 3d73Ybk3C5U4I2t8lv+lAQ.user.gioia.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.1 Content-Language: en-US X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2 Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:56664 Date: 2019-06-17T18:43:28+02:00 List-Id: On 2019-06-17 17:32, Paul Rubin wrote: > "Dmitry A. Kazakov" writes: >> No, record is not a mapping. A mapping (properly typed) is >> f : I -> V >> where I and V are *types*. You cannot define record members this >> way. Member names are not 1st class values, member values have >> different types. > > Each member name is in effect a mapping. I don't remember the record > member syntax but something like: > > type person is record: > name : string; > age : integer > end record > > Then basically "name" is a mapping from person to string, and "age" is a > mapping from person to integer, and there's some syntax sugar to deal > with member notation (xyz.name) and assignment (xyz.name := "John"). If Name were an entity in Ada then we could have syntax: Name(P) i.e. Name : Person -> String This would be a mapping. But it is not what Maciej asked, he wanted, I suppose, this: P(Name) P : ? -> ? instead of P.Name. This is not a mapping of 1st class objects. He could argue that Ada should follow C++ and use different syntax for different names: a::b a->b a.b To "improve" readability. Why names of an entry, child package, member, formal argument of a subprogram etc have all same form A.B. No fun! Unicode has 2**24 or so characters free... -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de