From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!gandalf.srv.welterde.de!news.jacob-sparre.dk!franka.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!.POSTED.rrsoftware.com!not-for-mail From: "Randy Brukardt" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Janus/Ada 3.2.1 Released! Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 17:40:42 -0500 Organization: JSA Research & Innovation Message-ID: References: Injection-Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 22:40:43 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: franka.jacob-sparre.dk; posting-host="rrsoftware.com:24.196.82.226"; logging-data="22647"; mail-complaints-to="news@jacob-sparre.dk" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.7246 Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:56779 Date: 2019-06-26T17:40:42-05:00 List-Id: "Jeffrey R. Carter" wrote in message news:qev4og$mk5$1@dont-email.me... > On 6/26/19 7:12 AM, Randy Brukardt wrote: >> A new version of Janus/Ada has finally made it to release. This version >> includes recognition of the full Ada 2012 syntax, null exclusions, >> private >> with, a number of language-defined libraries from both Ada 2005 and 2012, >> and code quality warnings to detect likely bugs early. > > Good news. I see that the website still refers to the compiler as > Janus/Ada 95. How much additional work is needed before you have a full > Ada-12 compiler? Probably more years than I have left on the planet. ;-) While I've mapped out a design for most new features, a few things have been pretty much ignored (esp. interfaces and real-time stuff). If I was able to find a business plan that made sense, it could get done faster, but as it stands I don't expect to ever break even with it and as such one can't really spend $$$ (as opposed to time) on it. Randy.