From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Jeffrey R. Carter" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Type naming conventions: Any_Foo Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2019 21:03:29 +0100 Organization: Also freenews.netfront.net; news.tornevall.net; news.eternal-september.org Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2019 20:03:29 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="ddbb247c959f2e7fbc1f00c09e538ea7"; logging-data="19552"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18rya1iRAxChsRJFtTpAR+juaLWLf81OPY=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.1 Cancel-Lock: sha1:BAam4JiOw2Kgwm7kelgKoRudzss= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:57660 Date: 2019-12-05T21:03:29+01:00 List-Id: On 12/5/19 6:45 PM, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: > > 1. Formal generic types. They are customarily named XXX_Type. Well chosen names for generic formal types do not end with _Type. The PragmAda Reusable Components have many generic formal types, none of which end with _Type. >       -- I don't want access type, I am required to have it Please provide examples of being required to have an access type. -- Jeff Carter "Ada has made you lazy and careless. You can write programs in C that are just as safe by the simple application of super-human diligence." E. Robert Tisdale 72