From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,243dc2fb696a49cd X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!wns13feed!worldnet.att.net!204.71.34.3!newsfeed.cwix.com!news.binc.net!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada Popularity: Comparison of Ada/Charles with C++ STL (and Perl) Date: 28 Oct 2004 05:26:12 -0500 Organization: Berbee Information Networks Corporation Message-ID: References: <41547dae$0$91007$39cecf19@news.twtelecom.net> <1g2d9xmnita9f.5ecju0eftkqw$.dlg@40tude.net> <1hl2mizeb27ku$.1f0asrbmb05mi.dlg@40tude.net> <7siml3c62lev$.usczt2y2l19c$.dlg@40tude.net> <15fk5715wm38q.3ie9r3bq8yuz$.Organization: LJK Software NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1098959107 23248 192.135.80.34 (28 Oct 2004 10:25:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 10:25:07 +0000 (UTC) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:5792 Date: 2004-10-28T05:26:12-05:00 List-Id: In article , "Robert Kawulak" writes: > Hi, > >> But software design, at least with Ada, is not about detecting errors. >> That would be debugging. (:-)) > > Would you like your compiler not to find errors then? (Just kidding... ;-) I would like my compiler not to find errors. I just want my compiler to be _capable_ of finding errors, on the distant chance there were any. So far the compilers are doing better at finding errors than I am at making the chance be distant.