From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Bj=c3=b6rn_Lundin?= <b.f.lundin@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Put the access value
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 14:31:08 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <r7pded$rjf$1@dont-email.me>
References: <5e956327$0$1635$e4fe514c@news.kpn.nl>
 <r745dg$eqh$1@dont-email.me> <5e95a814$0$1701$e4fe514c@news.kpn.nl>
 <b32fc764-f6dd-4c4d-8cfd-4b9ea968a86b@googlegroups.com>
 <c22996a5-4832-4eeb-8393-e30ab8eab6d7@googlegroups.com>
 <r7cdvt$fp5$1@dont-email.me> <r7nn8s$bik$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 12:31:09 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="8b3be3b0380b517c5f20848bab21d692";
	logging-data="28271"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+SZr/TiLDo2dNJaQ978iS7"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:68.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:MDQ5CPV9Y9WpScGeWyBFOKp7xYs=
In-Reply-To: <r7nn8s$bik$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
Content-Language: en-US
Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:58460
Date: 2020-04-22T14:31:08+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Den 2020-04-21 kl. 23:06, skrev Randy Brukardt:
> "Björn Lundin" <b.f.lundin@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:r7cdvt$fp5$1@dont-email.me...
>> Den 2020-04-15 kl. 10:02, skrev AdaMagica:
>>> Am Mittwoch, 15. April 2020 09:20:33 UTC+2 schrieb briot....@gmail.com:
>>>> The approach I tend to use is using `System.Address_Image`:
>>>
>>> This is not in the RM. It must be GNAT specific, which you should have
>>> said.
>>>
>>
>> Are you really saying that everything that is posted here
>> must be checked with the RM?
> 
> Ideally, everything posted here would note if it is GNAT-specific or
> something defined by Ada, because some of us do primarily use other Ada
> compilers. GNAT /= Ada!

I do agree, but the tone of AdaMagica is more like a professor telling a 
student what to do or not.

As if not helping the OP at all is much better than
suggest something not portable, but might be a solution to the 
particular problem, where it is not stated if portability is a 
requirement or not.

Irritating.

-- 
Björn