From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,c406e0c4a6eb74ed X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!wns13feed!worldnet.att.net!12.120.4.37!attcg2!ip.att.net!news.binc.net!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: ADA Popularity Discussion Request Date: 19 Aug 2004 09:36:56 -0500 Organization: LJK Software Message-ID: References: <49dc98cf.0408110556.18ae7df@posting.google.com> <1g5v98l6p9j6.omv7rea0j13k.dlg@40tude.net> <873c2ktjpj.fsf@insalien.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1092926148 10920 192.135.80.34 (19 Aug 2004 14:35:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 14:35:48 +0000 (UTC) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2852 Date: 2004-08-19T09:36:56-05:00 List-Id: In article , Jean-Pierre Rosen writes: > Ludovic Brenta a =E9crit : > >> Back in 1989, I used to respect Borland for the quality of their >> compilers. But now, in hindsight, what you said changed my >> perspective. >>=20 > Nothing new here. Borland never obeyed by the standards. Turbo Pascal=20 > always had "extensions". And I remember playing with Turbo Prolog that=20 > was conformant to no other Prolog of the time. For the Pascal case, _every_ Pascal seemed to have extensions, since real world applications have greater needs than the original teaching mission of Pascal.