From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED.jFK6OqqKW5bkmQ4H/i1UAQ.user.gioia.aioe.org!not-for-mail From: "Luke A. Guest" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada++ Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 11:36:38 +0100 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: References: <50711230-5b14-4278-b9d8-d197bbe3c93b@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: jFK6OqqKW5bkmQ4H/i1UAQ.user.gioia.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.1 Content-Language: en-GB X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2 Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:58863 Date: 2020-05-29T11:36:38+01:00 List-Id: On 29/05/2020 03:57, Rick Newbie wrote: > >> btw, I do not think changing Ada syntax to make it look like C and C++ >> isĀ  the solution to making "Ada" become more popular. If so, then >> they should change Ada to make it use Python syntax in that case :) > > As an Ada newbie I can tell you what is the most offturning thing about > Ada: > 1) The IDE does not measure up to Visual Studio Use Visual Studio then, there's a plugin. > 2) The GDB debugger As long it's integrated into the IDE, what's the issue? > 3) The fact that you need lots of various external libraries and you > have to deal with the Linux hell of library versions and installation to > accomplish basic things like a graphical user interface. You have to do this in any language. > The curly braces are definitely not a problem > Yeah they are, visually.