From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Jeffrey R. Carter" <spam.jrcarter.not@spam.not.acm.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Convention aspect stricter than before? - GNAT Community 2020
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2020 20:35:22 +0200
Organization: Also freenews.netfront.net; news.tornevall.net;
 news.eternal-september.org
Message-ID: <rb8qha$r3k$1@dont-email.me>
References: <b3b95127-bee2-47e2-aa9d-8d0a66668c0b@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2020 18:35:22 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="27cd3ee54823c80230cbe347ecced414";
	logging-data="27764"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/NM9qOU8oo86+4JCpq7Owjc4nEG7Vop+k="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.8.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:TBZBjpLgwFXifbK11LbtZvH4Q/k=
In-Reply-To: <b3b95127-bee2-47e2-aa9d-8d0a66668c0b@googlegroups.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:58955
Date: 2020-06-03T20:35:22+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 6/3/20 7:59 PM, Jesper Quorning wrote:
> 
> CE2020 accepts the specification when pragma Convention is used as for Record_2.
> 
> Is there an Ada 2012 way to solve this without moving Private_Record out of private part or using a pragma?

The aspect and pragma are supposed to be equivalent, so this looks like a 
compiler error.

-- 
Jeff Carter
"Help! Help! I'm being repressed!"
Monty Python & the Holy Grail
67