From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "J-P. Rosen" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: How can I get this data into the .data section of the binary? Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 15:29:32 +0200 Organization: Adalog Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 13:29:32 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="efb6c04cd982ed11b3f78246b60c855f"; logging-data="17394"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/feDLW0BmJGqOpum8oOYS5" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:SMhjFx4heRzK7CfVZD60oHXGJy8= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: fr Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:59089 List-Id: Le 16/06/2020 à 14:59, Luke A. Guest a écrit : > Which misses the point entirely of my original issue, and complete > hatred of this part of Ada. Literally, if something can be compiled to > be in the data section, it should be. I understand your problem, but this is a compiler issue, not a language issue. There is no such thing as a "data section" in a high level, machine independent, definition of a programming language... -- J-P. Rosen Adalog 2 rue du Docteur Lombard, 92441 Issy-les-Moulineaux CEDEX Tel: +33 1 45 29 21 52, Fax: +33 1 45 29 25 00 http://www.adalog.fr