From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED.jFK6OqqKW5bkmQ4H/i1UAQ.user.gioia.aioe.org!not-for-mail From: "Luke A. Guest" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: How can I get this data into the .data section of the binary? Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 15:42:08 +0100 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: jFK6OqqKW5bkmQ4H/i1UAQ.user.gioia.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2 Content-Language: en-GB Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:59097 List-Id: On 16/06/2020 15:25, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: > On 16/06/2020 16:14, Niklas Holsti wrote: >> I have no idea if this will help you -- the types in our case were >> much simpler -- but you might try it with a small subset of your package: >> >>     Pixel_Format_Unknown     : constant Pixel_Format_Names := >>       (True, (NUL, NUL, NUL, NUL)); >> >> (assuming "use Ada.Characters.Latin_1"). > > That is interesting. Was there the "others =>" part? > > I can imagine that with "others => NUL" a static zeroed section were > used with other parts written upon it during start. > > P.S. I hope more people now see why compile-time subprograms are necessary. > I don't think Ada needs compile-time subprograms, it just needs to recognise actual static data which can be generated at compile time, also the static_predicate could be evaluated by the compiler at runtime too.