From: "Luke A. Guest" <laguest@archeia.com>
Subject: Re: Convention aspect stricter than before? - GNAT Community 2020
Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2020 10:46:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <rglsd4$147n$1@gioia.aioe.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: rgl678$9u4$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk
On 08/08/2020 04:29, Randy Brukardt wrote:
> I don't see anything in this package specification that freezes any of these
> types (other than "end", but of course that's well after the aspects and
> pragmas are given). Occurrences in a type declaration don't freeze a type
> (if they did, you couldn't mention a private type as a component type at
> all, since a partial view cannot be frozen before it is completed).
>
> In any case, the pragma and aspect should be the same, so there's clearly a
> bug.
A bug in the compiler?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-08 9:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-03 17:59 Convention aspect stricter than before? - GNAT Community 2020 Jesper Quorning
2020-06-03 18:35 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2020-08-04 13:31 ` Fabien Chouteau
2020-08-08 3:29 ` Randy Brukardt
2020-08-08 9:46 ` Luke A. Guest [this message]
2020-08-10 0:15 ` Randy Brukardt
2020-08-10 6:35 ` Luke A. Guest
2020-08-10 9:15 ` Simon Wright
2020-08-10 14:53 ` Luke A. Guest
2020-08-11 7:18 ` Jesper Quorning
2020-08-11 7:34 ` Luke A. Guest
2020-08-11 16:23 ` Jesper Quorning
2020-08-11 19:23 ` Luke A. Guest
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox