From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Subject: Re: Convention aspect stricter than before? - GNAT Community 2020
Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2020 19:15:25 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <rgq3iu$3tm$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: rglsd4$147n$1@gioia.aioe.org
"Luke A. Guest" <laguest@archeia.com> wrote in message
news:rglsd4$147n$1@gioia.aioe.org...
> On 08/08/2020 04:29, Randy Brukardt wrote:
>
>> I don't see anything in this package specification that freezes any of
>> these
>> types (other than "end", but of course that's well after the aspects and
>> pragmas are given). Occurrences in a type declaration don't freeze a type
>> (if they did, you couldn't mention a private type as a component type at
>> all, since a partial view cannot be frozen before it is completed).
>>
>> In any case, the pragma and aspect should be the same, so there's clearly
>> a
>> bug.
>
> A bug in the compiler?
Yes. Regardless of what the correct behavior is for a particular example,
the pragma is equivalent to the aspect so the results should be the same. If
they differ, then there certainly is a compiler bug. *Exactly* what that bug
is might be debatable (although I think it is pretty clear in this case).
Randy.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-10 0:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-03 17:59 Convention aspect stricter than before? - GNAT Community 2020 Jesper Quorning
2020-06-03 18:35 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2020-08-04 13:31 ` Fabien Chouteau
2020-08-08 3:29 ` Randy Brukardt
2020-08-08 9:46 ` Luke A. Guest
2020-08-10 0:15 ` Randy Brukardt [this message]
2020-08-10 6:35 ` Luke A. Guest
2020-08-10 9:15 ` Simon Wright
2020-08-10 14:53 ` Luke A. Guest
2020-08-11 7:18 ` Jesper Quorning
2020-08-11 7:34 ` Luke A. Guest
2020-08-11 16:23 ` Jesper Quorning
2020-08-11 19:23 ` Luke A. Guest
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox