From: "Luke A. Guest" <laguest@archeia.com>
Subject: Re: Convention aspect stricter than before? - GNAT Community 2020
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 20:23:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <rgurb4$7b9$1@gioia.aioe.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: e5df521f-3eb3-4455-a48b-704f8ad76689n@googlegroups.com
On 11/08/2020 17:23, Jesper Quorning wrote:
> tirsdag den 11. august 2020 kl. 09.35.52 UTC+2 skrev Luke A. Guest:
>> On 11/08/2020 08:18, Jesper Quorning wrote:
>>> Guess there is a design problem in the binding..
>>>
>> No, it's all pointing at a compiler bug.
>
> Compiler bug and binding design problem I guess..
>
AFAICT from other responses, you're the only person who thinks this. The
binding is fine AFAIK. The only issue might be the that that the padding
record is private.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-11 19:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-03 17:59 Convention aspect stricter than before? - GNAT Community 2020 Jesper Quorning
2020-06-03 18:35 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2020-08-04 13:31 ` Fabien Chouteau
2020-08-08 3:29 ` Randy Brukardt
2020-08-08 9:46 ` Luke A. Guest
2020-08-10 0:15 ` Randy Brukardt
2020-08-10 6:35 ` Luke A. Guest
2020-08-10 9:15 ` Simon Wright
2020-08-10 14:53 ` Luke A. Guest
2020-08-11 7:18 ` Jesper Quorning
2020-08-11 7:34 ` Luke A. Guest
2020-08-11 16:23 ` Jesper Quorning
2020-08-11 19:23 ` Luke A. Guest [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox