From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1 Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!5WHqCw2XxjHb2npjM9GYbw.user.gioia.aioe.org.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Unchecked_Deallocation with tagged types Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 21:35:59 +0200 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: References: <607b56f8$0$3721$426a34cc@news.free.fr> <07863309-4541-4497-8cec-d88179e634bdn@googlegroups.com> <3d6e49b6-f195-4dc2-bf4b-795f18f2da9dn@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 5WHqCw2XxjHb2npjM9GYbw.user.gioia.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.9.1 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2 Content-Language: en-US Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:61873 List-Id: On 2021-04-20 20:53, Randy Brukardt wrote: > OTOH, an Ada > follow-on would most likely have access types with automatic deallocation as > proposed by Tucker in one of the many AIs on ownership. So using any form of > explicit deallocation would be discouraged (as would the use of raw pointer > types). I do not understand how that could work, it sounds like a halting problem to me, but anyway, where is a problem? Add a whole new hierarchy of access types independent on the existing one. -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de