From: "J-P. Rosen" <rosen@adalog.fr>
Subject: Re: Better way to fill Storage_IO?
Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 21:25:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <s83oo3$s2s$1@dont-email.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <s82i3g$el$1@dont-email.me>
Le 19/05/2021 à 10:26, Björn Lundin a écrit :
> Given the above I do prefer
>
>
> Text_IO.Put_Line ("Next is " & Next_Location'Image);
>
> over
>
> Text_IO.Put_Line ("Next is " &
> Coded_Values.WCS_Next_Location_Type_Type'Image(Next_Location));
Interesting example. When I define a type that I want to be able to
print, I define also (in the same place) an instantiation of
Integer_IO/Enumeration_IO, and I would write:
Put ("Next is "); Put (Next_Location); New_Line;
'Image was not intended for regular IO.
--
J-P. Rosen
Adalog
2 rue du Docteur Lombard, 92441 Issy-les-Moulineaux CEDEX
Tel: +33 1 45 29 21 52
https://www.adalog.fr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-19 19:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-17 18:44 Better way to fill Storage_IO? Michael Hardeman
2021-05-17 19:14 ` Simon Wright
2021-05-17 19:23 ` Michael Hardeman
2021-05-18 20:39 ` Simon Wright
2021-05-19 6:24 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2021-05-19 7:17 ` J-P. Rosen
2021-05-19 8:26 ` Björn Lundin
2021-05-19 19:25 ` J-P. Rosen [this message]
2021-05-19 19:58 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2021-05-19 20:18 ` Björn Lundin
2021-05-20 5:38 ` Niklas Holsti
2021-05-20 6:50 ` J-P. Rosen
2021-05-20 22:24 ` Randy Brukardt
2021-05-19 15:39 ` Simon Wright
2021-05-17 20:20 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2021-05-17 20:48 ` Michael Hardeman
2021-05-18 14:00 ` Per Sandberg
2021-05-18 9:08 ` J-P. Rosen
2021-05-18 10:10 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2021-05-18 16:50 ` Shark8
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox