From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1 Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!JUN8/iIzeA71QWaIWFKODA.user.gioia.aioe.org.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Luke A. Guest" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: why the pascal family of languages (Pascal, Ada, Modula-2,2,Oberon, Delphi, Algol,...) failed compared to the C family? Date: Sun, 30 May 2021 17:12:50 +0100 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: References: <5afvagd0g4uajs1ji35v3lorkgb2kd56qu@4ax.com> <87wnrkf9pr.fsf@nightsong.com> <37c582bb-3012-4954-a26c-5d9614ac0c84n@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: JUN8/iIzeA71QWaIWFKODA.user.gioia.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.2 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2 Content-Language: en-GB Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:62047 List-Id: On 28/05/2021 14:28, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: > Otherwise yes, it was pretty fast, much faster than MS-DOS C/C++ Apparently, they were fast because the Turbo compilers didn't do optimisations due to the limitations of the machines. > compilers of the time, Borland's own C++ including. >