From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_40,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM,NICE_REPLY_A autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Rod Kay Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Building the 2021 source release of GnatStudio Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 20:37:55 +1000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 10:37:59 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="e2f2653946ad473855e3b196482d0a99"; logging-data="3351"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19t5j99I4CLXEqvPVkx9xPR9pNugklZiVs=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.12.0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:wwxc4GrZBGwou9djnghwVVDEyPQ= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:62437 List-Id: On 29/7/21 10:49 am, Randy Brukardt wrote: > "Rod Kay" wrote in message > news:sdr7qu$cuj$1@dont-email.me... > ... >> Ada is touted for its safety, stability and portability. What would >> new-comers think when the main Ada IDE, produced by the main Ada vendor, >> breaks so frequently (every yearly release, there have been similar >> difficulties). > > Since the "main Ada IDE" isn't even an Ada program (primarily being > programmed in Python), I'm not sure what it has to do with the reliability > of Ada programs. If someone built an all-Ada IDE, then that might make more > sense. And in any case, programs like an IDE are almost always installed > from binary packages. > I guess the point I was trying to make was 'Why is GnatStudio using Python at all, given that Ada is superior ?'.