From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!Lx7EM+81f32E0bqku+QpCA.user.46.165.242.75.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Luke A. Guest" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: How to challenge a GCC patch? Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 08:53:06 +0100 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="16787"; posting-host="Lx7EM+81f32E0bqku+QpCA.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org"; User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2 Content-Language: en-GB Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:62881 List-Id: On 30/09/2021 07:23, J-P. Rosen wrote: > Le 30/09/2021 à 01:29, Luke A. Guest a écrit : >> >> On 29/09/2021 20:04, Emmanuel Briot wrote: >> >>> I suggested in an early message that perhaps the community could >>> build an ASIS API on top of libadalang, if there is a need for that. >>> I also suggested that libadalang documentation should be improved, I >>> definitely agree with that one ! >>> >> >> Freely available iso asis spec would help here. > Actually, it is. Apart from ISO verbiage, all the interesting parts of > the ASIS standard is put as comments in the corresponding ASIS packages. > > Moreover, AdaCore kept this good habit for all the newly introduced > features that support up to Ada 2012, which would make retrofitting them > into an updated ASIS standard quite easy. > Are they gpl'd?