From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,XPRIO autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!gandalf.srv.welterde.de!news.jacob-sparre.dk!franka.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!.POSTED.rrsoftware.com!not-for-mail From: "Randy Brukardt" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: How to challenge a GCC patch? Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 19:33:46 -0500 Organization: JSA Research & Innovation Message-ID: References: Injection-Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2021 00:33:47 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: franka.jacob-sparre.dk; posting-host="rrsoftware.com:24.196.82.226"; logging-data="26089"; mail-complaints-to="news@jacob-sparre.dk" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.7246 Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:62907 List-Id: "J-P. Rosen" wrote in message news:sj4519$rg0$1@dont-email.me... ... > If you are talking about the official ASIS specs ("like the packages in > the Ada RM"), they are part of an ISO standard, and as such under ISO > copyright. However, in the case of APIs, ISO allows their use by any > implementation (otherwise, they would be useless). This is news to me. As far as I can tell, any API that is the bulk ofan ISO Standard *is* useless, because you need an ISO license to use it. Smaller APIs might be usable as "fair use", but they can't be 90% of the Standard's text, as in ASIS. On what basis do you think that "ISO allows their use by any implementation"; I see no such thing in any ISO Standard?? Randy.