From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,XPRIO autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!gandalf.srv.welterde.de!news.jacob-sparre.dk!franka.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!.POSTED.rrsoftware.com!not-for-mail From: "Randy Brukardt" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GCC updated in NetBSD! Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 01:04:04 -0500 Organization: JSA Research & Innovation Message-ID: References: Injection-Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 06:04:06 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: franka.jacob-sparre.dk; posting-host="rrsoftware.com:24.196.82.226"; logging-data="14663"; mail-complaints-to="news@jacob-sparre.dk" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.7246 Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:63042 List-Id: "Simon Wright" wrote in message news:lyzgr3h0t2.fsf@pushface.org... ... > *** FAILURES: c250002 c324006 c35503d c35503f c415001 c611a04 cxaib05 > cxaib08 cxd1003 cxd1004 cxd1005 cxd2006 cxd3001 cxd3002 > ... > C35503D GCC 11 supports 128-bit integers > C35503F likewise These two are "macro" tests, such that one is supposed to modify the values in the Macro.Dfs file and regenerate these tests with the correct values. If the compiler supports 128-bit integers, then those values would be different (and a lot longer) than the values for 64-bit integers. They could of course fail for some other reason, but getting those values wrong in the original substitution is bad. Randy.