From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,76ec5d55630beb71 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-03 05:29:09 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!news.telebyte.nl!newsfeed.vmunix.org!news-FFM2.ecrc.net!news.iks-jena.de!not-for-mail From: Lutz Donnerhacke Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada 200X Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 12:14:43 +0000 (UTC) Organization: IKS GmbH Jena Message-ID: References: <3EDC0BE6.42300129@somewhere.nil> NNTP-Posting-Host: taranis.iks-jena.de X-Trace: branwen.iks-jena.de 1054642483 25714 217.17.192.37 (3 Jun 2003 12:14:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@iks-jena.de NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 12:14:43 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:38460 Date: 2003-06-03T12:14:43+00:00 List-Id: * Preben Randhol wrote: > Well I wouldn't say Ada is slow. I think C would be just as slow if it > *had* bounds checking. No. C has to do much more checks, because the compiler can not deduce when the checks are not necessary.