From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,131ac66ded247fcc X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsread.com!news-xfer.newsread.com!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsfeed.sunet.se!news01.sunet.se!news.umu.se!not-for-mail From: Paul Colin Gloster Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Is there a translator from SPARK Ada to VHDL? Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 15:49:33 +0000 (UTC) Organization: News UmU SE Message-ID: References: <2e9040a1.0501201544.553ad2ac@posting.google.com> <1106284742.327319.93190@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com> <1106480549.963006.322830@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com> <2e9040a1.0502101003.3f46ce16@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: ryp76.ryp.umu.se X-Trace: hudsucker.umdac.umu.se 1109519373 16115 130.239.11.76 (27 Feb 2005 15:49:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@umu.se NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 15:49:33 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:8514 Date: 2005-02-27T15:49:33+00:00 List-Id: In article <2e9040a1.0502101003.3f46ce16@posting.google.com>, Jim wrote: "[..] [..] I think, that the Spark Ada isn't suitable for hardware description, special for FPGA in safety critical systems, [..] then with the other synthesis tool e.g.Xilinx WebPack write VHDL code in FPGA.? [..]" Xilinx WebPACK is not suitable for safety critical systems.