From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: invalid Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: How to get Ada to ?cross the chasm?? Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2018 17:52:39 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: References: <1c73f159-eae4-4ae7-a348-03964b007197@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 52iKuiSUpRLaAD3LrS+iGw.user.gioia.aioe.org X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: slrn/1.0.2 (Linux) X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.3 Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:51671 Date: 2018-04-22T17:52:39+00:00 List-Id: On 2018-04-20, briot.emmanuel@gmail.com wrote: > >> Adacore force the GPL on any software developed using the Community >> version. See > > > Correct me if I am wrong, but basically your message is: > ><<< > I want to make money selling my software, but I certainly don't want to pay anything to any other software provider for this. They should all give me for free what I need. >>>> > Can't speak for the guy you're quoting but I understood his comments had to do with the lousy compiler situation for Ada. Most individual developers who don't have a product to ship _today_ cannot afford the multiple tens of thousands of dollars it costs to buy support for Adacore's publicly funded goldmine. And there are not any other affordable compilers for Ada for people who _are_ willing to pay a reasonable price. Intel sells pretty good Fortran and C/C++ compilers for about USD 1.250. The compiler situation today is bad overall, not just for Ada. But it's particularly bad for Ada.