From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,fda5a12bddfaf1a7 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!newsread.com!news-xfer.newsread.com!newspeer.monmouth.com!news-FFM2.ecrc.net!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!nntp.infostrada.it!twister2.libero.it.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Matteo Bertini User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041214 Thunderbird/1.0 Mnenhy/0.7 X-Accept-Language: it, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada-Python inter-language testing References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 09:15:04 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 151.42.79.158 X-Complaints-To: abuse@net24.it X-Trace: twister2.libero.it 1106039704 151.42.79.158 (Tue, 18 Jan 2005 10:15:04 MET) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 10:15:04 MET Organization: [Infostrada] Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:7886 Date: 2005-01-18T09:15:04+00:00 List-Id: oh, yes, unit-testing is there only because this is and university exam related work, I was thinking about integration in general! PolyORB could be very interesting, for example it seems to support exception passing, and in my coding I'm finding it very hard to have. By the way consider also ctypes[1], once exported a la C, ctypes can access every function in a dll with a little pure python coding (on the fly). [1] http://starship.python.net/crew/theller/ctypes/ Thanks for the answers, Matteo Bertini Simon Wright wrote: > One of us is considering CORBA (PolyORB on the Ada (GNAT) side, > omniORB on the Python side). I can see it for integration support, > but for unit testing .. I don't think so, but we shall see!