From: "Luke A. Guest" <laguest@archeia.com>
Subject: Re: Renaissance-Ada, a toolset for legacy Ada software, made open source
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2022 10:10:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <st0fe9$16a0$1@gioia.aioe.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 2a680ba5-deff-4473-840c-1db8e55d0957n@googlegroups.com
On 28/01/2022 02:23, Andreas ZEURCHER wrote:
> On Thursday, January 27, 2022 at 6:55:11 AM UTC-6, Luke A. Guest wrote:
>> On 27/01/2022 12:32, Pierre van de Laar wrote:
>>> Dear Members of comp.lang.ada,
>>>
>>> We would like to inform you that we have made Renaissance-Ada, a toolset for legacy Ada software, open source:
>>> https://github.com/TNO/Renaissance-Ada
>>>
>> What does "for legacy Ada software" mean?
> I would suspect that “for legacy Ada software” might be a euphemistic way of saying: doesn't support modern Ada after either Ada83 or Ada95.
I kind of read is as, they made a toolset ages ago and have ported it to
libadalang. But if it's new, why only support older Ada when you've
based it on a newer Ada, especially a newer ada lib?
It's weird.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-28 10:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-27 12:32 Renaissance-Ada, a toolset for legacy Ada software, made open source Pierre van de Laar
2022-01-27 12:55 ` Luke A. Guest
2022-01-28 2:23 ` Andreas ZEURCHER
2022-01-28 10:10 ` Luke A. Guest [this message]
2022-01-28 11:42 ` Jesper Quorning
2022-01-28 12:31 ` Simon Wright
2022-01-28 13:58 ` Jeffrey R.Carter
2022-01-28 20:01 ` Stephen Leake
2022-01-28 10:27 ` Simon Wright
2022-01-29 9:26 ` G.B.
2022-01-29 9:49 ` AdaMagica
2022-01-29 18:35 ` G.B.
2022-01-29 19:43 ` Simon Wright
2022-01-30 16:16 ` AdaMagica
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox